Skip to main content

Carbon tax Co-ordination, between the UK and the EU.

 

Carbon
Bri­tain and the EU are boost­ing coordin­a­tion of efforts to tackle cli­mate change and respond to a vast US green sub­sidy pro­gramme, in a sign of warm­ing rela­tions between the two sides.

Rishi Sunak, prime min­is­ter, said this week that Bri­tain and the EU could coordin­ate moves on a car­bon bor­der tax that would place a levy on impor­ted car­bon-intens­ive goods arriv­ing in Europe.

The gov­ern­ment will today launch a con­sulta­tion on intro­du­cing a «car­bon bor­der adjust­ment mech­an­ism» as part of a broader net zero strategy.

Grant Shapps, energy sec­ret­ary, said the con­sulta­tion would address the risk of future «car­bon leak­age», where busi­nesses move pro­duc­tion to a coun­try with weaker cli­mate reg­u­la­tions to avoid pay­ing a car­bon levy.

Offi­cials said the aim was to work with like-minded coun­tries and that the UK and EU were giv­ing ser­i­ous con­sid­er­a­tion to link­ing their car­bon pri­cing sys­tems. «It makes sense,» said one.

Mean­while, Kemi Badenoch, trade sec­ret­ary, held talks yes­ter­day with Valdis Dom­brovs­kis, EU trade com­mis­sioner, to dis­cuss a co-ordin­ated response to US pres­id­ent Joe Biden’s Infla­tion Reduc­tion Act.

People close to Badenoch said Biden’s $369bn sub­sidy pro­gramme threw up sim­ilar chal­lenges for the EU and UK, along with other Wash­ing­ton allies, such as Aus­tralia and Japan. Dis­cus­sions between Lon­don and Brus­sels on cli­mate-related issues are the latest sig­nal of improv­ing EU-UK rela­tions after the res­ol­u­tion last month of a cor­ros­ive row over post-Brexit trad­ing rela­tions in North­ern Ire­land.

The Treas­ury raised the pro­spect of a CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanic) in its net zero reviews in Octo­ber 2021 but warned that the pro­cess could be hugely com­plic­ated to imple­ment.

The EU’s CBAM, which is close to approval and will start levy­ing charges in 2026, has already proved con­tro­ver­sial. China has asked for dis­cus­sions at the World Trade Organ­iz­a­tion, say­ing it could be dis­crim­in­at­ory.

sba.tax


What is CBAM

The carbon border adjustment mechanism is a policy measure aimed at reducing the risk of carbon leakage. It works by placing a tax on imported goods that have high levels of greenhouse gas emissions. The idea behind this is to create an incentive for companies to reduce their carbon footprint, as well as to level the playing field for domestic producers who are subject to stricter environmental regulations. The implementation of such a mechanism has been met with both support and criticism, with some arguing that it could lead to trade wars or harm developing countries. However, proponents argue that it is necessary in order to achieve global climate goals and prevent a race to the bottom in terms of environmental standards. Ultimately, the success of a carbon border adjustment mechanism will depend on its design and implementation, as well as broader international cooperation on climate change



Labels:

Comments

  1. Stanley30 March 2023 at 09:55

    Carbon leakage is a serious threat as many companies currently do it and should be held accountable for this. There should be clear, swift and serious repercussions for those that always put profit above anything else.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lionel30 March 2023 at 10:55

      I agree completely. This is a very serious matter as our own survival as humans is at stake and we can't let things slide anymore. It's too late. Such companies should both be encouraged to do the right things and punished severely if/when they don't.

      Delete
  2. Claudia30 March 2023 at 12:01

    I don't know if CBAM (the way I understand it) is a good idea. We should stick to doing the easy, simple things first and gradually grow from there. Going for something that is both hard to implement and controversial is not going to help.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...
4 comments
Read more

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...
2 comments
Read more

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...
3 comments
Read more