Britain and the EU are boosting coordination of efforts to tackle climate change and respond to a vast US green subsidy programme, in a sign of warming relations between the two sides.
Rishi Sunak, prime minister, said this week that Britain and the EU could coordinate moves on a carbon border tax that would place a levy on imported carbon-intensive goods arriving in Europe.
The government will today launch a consultation on introducing a «carbon border adjustment mechanism» as part of a broader net zero strategy.
Grant Shapps, energy secretary, said the consultation would address the risk of future «carbon leakage», where businesses move production to a country with weaker climate regulations to avoid paying a carbon levy.
Officials said the aim was to work with like-minded countries and that the UK and EU were giving serious consideration to linking their carbon pricing systems. «It makes sense,» said one.
Meanwhile, Kemi Badenoch, trade secretary, held talks yesterday with Valdis Dombrovskis, EU trade commissioner, to discuss a co-ordinated response to US president Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act.
People close to Badenoch said Biden’s $369bn subsidy programme threw up similar challenges for the EU and UK, along with other Washington allies, such as Australia and Japan. Discussions between London and Brussels on climate-related issues are the latest signal of improving EU-UK relations after the resolution last month of a corrosive row over post-Brexit trading relations in Northern Ireland.
The Treasury raised the prospect of a CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanic) in its net zero reviews in October 2021 but warned that the process could be hugely complicated to implement.
The EU’s CBAM, which is close to approval and will start levying charges in 2026, has already proved controversial. China has asked for discussions at the World Trade Organization, saying it could be discriminatory.
What is CBAM
The carbon border adjustment mechanism is a policy measure aimed at reducing the risk of carbon leakage. It works by placing a tax on imported goods that have high levels of greenhouse gas emissions. The idea behind this is to create an incentive for companies to reduce their carbon footprint, as well as to level the playing field for domestic producers who are subject to stricter environmental regulations. The implementation of such a mechanism has been met with both support and criticism, with some arguing that it could lead to trade wars or harm developing countries. However, proponents argue that it is necessary in order to achieve global climate goals and prevent a race to the bottom in terms of environmental standards. Ultimately, the success of a carbon border adjustment mechanism will depend on its design and implementation, as well as broader international cooperation on climate change
Carbon leakage is a serious threat as many companies currently do it and should be held accountable for this. There should be clear, swift and serious repercussions for those that always put profit above anything else.
ReplyDeleteI agree completely. This is a very serious matter as our own survival as humans is at stake and we can't let things slide anymore. It's too late. Such companies should both be encouraged to do the right things and punished severely if/when they don't.
DeleteI don't know if CBAM (the way I understand it) is a good idea. We should stick to doing the easy, simple things first and gradually grow from there. Going for something that is both hard to implement and controversial is not going to help.
ReplyDelete