Skip to main content

Microsoft prepares mobile games.

Microsoft

Microsoft is pre­par­ing to launch an app store for games on iPhones and Android smart­phones as soon as next year if its $75bn acquis­i­tion of Act­i­v­i­sion Bliz­zard is cleared by reg­u­lat­ors, accord­ing to the head of its Xbox busi­ness. «We want to be in a pos­i­tion to offer Xbox and con­tent from both us and our third-party part­ners across any screen where some­body would want to play,» said Phil Spen­cer, chief exec­ut­ive of Microsoft Gam­ing, in an inter­view ahead of this week’s annual Game Developers Con­fer­ence in San Fran­cisco, which starts today. Microsoft is fight­ing with reg­u­lat­ors in the US, Europe and UK, which have all raised con­cerns about the poten­tial impact on com­pet­i­tion from the owner of the Xbox con­sole buy­ing the developer of Call of Duty, one of the world’s most pop­u­lar games fran­chises. While acknow­ledging it was hard to pre­dict exactly when Microsoft will be able to launch its own store, Spen­cer said it would be «pretty trivial» for Microsoft to adapt its Xbox and Game Pass apps to sell games and sub­scrip­tions on mobile devices.

Microsoft’s cur­rent lack of mobile games was an «obvi­ous hole in our cap­ab­il­ity» that it needed Act­i­v­i­sion Bliz­zard to fill, he added. Microsoft has argued that Apple’s App Store rules restrict its abil­ity to offer cloud gam­ing through a single app that runs nat­ively on the iPhone, for­cing users to access the ser­vice via a web browser, with lower per­form­ance.

Comments

  1. The Activision deal will probably go through although we don't know when that will be. Will it be in 2023 or next year? I'm hoping that a change in leadership comes with it at Activision because the scandals they were involved in showed that there is no leadership there.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sony tried to stop the Blizzard deal saying that Microsoft will become too powerful and can choose to not allow Call of Duty on PlayStation. It's not out of the question that this can happen. It might not happen in 2-3 years but after that, it's anyone's guess.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Spencer shouldn't have used those words "pretty trivial" because they add extra pressure to the people that actually have to make this work. Just say it's probably going to get done quickly. And I don't think the deal will go down this year. Most likely in 2024.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...