Skip to main content

Pakistan's economy is in crisis.

 Prime Min­is­ter Shehbaz Sharif on Tues­day expressed his «sin­cere regrets for the incon­veni­ence» and

Pakistan flag

said an inquiry would determ­ine the cause. «Already a lot of indus­tries have closed down, and if those indus­tries don’t restart soon, some of the losses will be per­man­ent,» said Sakib Sher­ani, founder of Macro Eco­nomic Insights, a con­sultancy in Islamabad. Ana­lysts warn that the eco­nomic situ­ation is becom­ing unten­able, and Pakistan is at risk of fol­low­ing Sri Lanka, where a lack of for­eign reserves triggered severe short­ages of essen­tial goods and led to a default in May. Islamabad’s for­eign reserves have dropped below $5bn, less than enough for a whole month of imports, and Sharif’s gov­ern­ment remains in a dead­lock with the IMF over resur­rect­ing a $7bn assist­ance pack­age that stalled last year.

Ahsan Iqbal, plan­ning min­is­ter, told the Fin­an­cial Times that Pakistan had reduced imports «drastic­ally» in an attempt to con­serve for­eign cur­rency. Pakistan is still reel­ing from dev­ast­at­ing floods last year, which affected tens of mil­lions of people and caused dam­age estim­ated at $30bn. Sharif’s gov­ern­ment has said it is com­mit­ted to reviv­ing the IMF deal to unlock the next tranche of funds. But the sides remain at odds over the IMF’s demand that Pakistan accepts eco­nomic reforms, such as rais­ing sub­sid­ised energy prices.

Islamabad argues that push­ing through pain­ful aus­ter­ity meas­ures, while it is recov­er­ing from the floods, is imprac­tical.

www.sba.tax

Comments

  1. The IMF has a point and Pakistan also has a point. The problem is it takes way too much time for them to come to an agreement and it's possible that by the time they do, it will be too late for the country.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pakistan is going to be worse than Sri Lanka because they have more people. It will be horrible and it will happen this year. I don't see any way of them coming back from this. Things are just way too bad now.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...