Skip to main content

FCA will oversee crypto companies.

 

crypt currencies
The new powers will allow the FCA to oversee crypto more broadly, including monitoring how companies operate and advertise their products, three people familiar with the Treasury’s thinking said. They added there would be restrictions on selling into the UK market from overseas and that the proposals would set out how crypto companies can be wound down. The government’s aspiration to become a global hub has come into sharp focus in the intervening months as the crypto industry became embroiled in crisis after crisis. «Yes, there are questions about the future of crypto, but we’d be foolish to ignore the potential of the underlying technology,» he told an event in Edinburgh.

The government would be «consulting on a world-leading regime for the rest of the crypto-asset market later this year». «The government has already taken steps to bring certain crypto assets activities into the scope of UK regulation and will consult on proposals for a broader regulatory regime.» The UK launched a consultation on crypto regulation in 2021, mainly focused on stablecoins. However, some government insiders believe the consultation timetable could slip into early 2023 because of «fast-moving events» in the industry. Last week, FCA chief executive Nikhil Rathi told the FT’s banking summit that his agency was already being «proactive» in areas where it does not yet have powers, including publicly warning about «the risks of investing in crypto, the potential to lose all your money».

He added that 85 per cent of the firms who applied to join the regulator’s crypto register did not pass the FCA’s anti-money laundering tests.

www.sba.tax

Comments

  1. The last paragraph in this article is not surprising but still shocking. 85% is a huge number and goes to show us how full of scams and doubtful cryptos and companies the whole crypto market is.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...