Skip to main content

The goverment cannot introduce a cap at airports.

 

Airplane
The Dutch gov­ern­ment can­not intro­duce a cap on flight num­bers at Schiphol air­port, Ams­ter­dam, a court has ruled, block­ing an attempt to reduce the industry’s envir­on­mental impact.

A court in Haar­lem said yes­ter­day that the gov­ern­ment could not cut flight num­bers by 8 cent, to 460,000 a year, because it had not gone through the cor­rect pro­ced­ures when it brought in the rules as tem­por­ary meas­ures.

«Accord­ing to European rules, the state can only reduce the num­ber of air trans­port move­ments at an air­port after going through a care­ful pro­cess,» the court said.

Other car­ri­ers, includ­ing easyJet, Tui and Delta, were involved in bring­ing the case. Schiphol said the decision provided clar­ity and pledged to «con­tinue with everything we do to make avi­ation quieter and cleaner».

The infra­struc­ture and water man­age­ment min­istry did not respond to a request for com­ment.

The case res­ted on the local impact of fly­ing, includ­ing noise and nitro­gen diox­ide levels, and was closely watched in the European sec­tor as one of the state’s first efforts to limit fly­ing on envir­on­mental grounds.

But cam­paign­ers have ques­tioned the poten­tial of the tech­no­lo­gies, which are com­mer­cially unproven, and said the judg­ment was a set­back.

«The avi­ation sec­tor is spin­ning a flawed net zero nar­rat­ive to cover for its pur­suit of industry growth in total con­tra­dic­tion with cli­mate goals,» Johnny White, a law­yer at char­ity Cli­ent Earth, said.

Schiphol, major­ity-owned by the state, has stood out as an air­port will­ing to sac­ri­fice growth because of envir­on­mental con­cerns.

This week announced plans to become «quieter, cleaner and bet­ter» and said it would con­sult air­lines on a ban on night flights and private jets and a reversal of plans to build an addi­tional run­way.

www.sba.tax

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...
4 comments
Read more

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...
3 comments
Read more

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...
2 comments
Read more