Skip to main content

Digital tax for big tech companies.

Tax
 The world’s largest tech com­pan­ies are expec­ted to «cir­cum­vent» the gov­ern­ment’s spe­cial tax on digital com­pan­ies before new inter­na­tional rules are imple­men­ted, an influ­en­tial group of MPs has warned.

In a report pub­lished yes­ter­day, the House of Com­mons pub­lic accounts com­mit­tee found that the digital ser­vices tax raised £358mn from 18 com­pan­ies in its first year — 30 per cent more than expec­ted. But it warned that the «suc­cess­ful imple­ment­a­tion» of the levy in 2020-21 was unlikely to con­tinue.

Min­is­ters brought in the new digital ser­vices tax in 2020 as a tem­por­ary meas­ure to address con­cerns that tech com­pan­ies were declar­ing very low profits in the UK by divert­ing profits made on UK sales to coun­tries with lower cor­por­ate tax rates.

Other coun­tries such as France, Spain, Italy and Tur­key imple­men­ted sim­ilar meas­ures. However, most, includ­ing the UK, have said they would repeal the levy once an OECD agree­ment, which would allow coun­tries to tax an ele­ment of the largest mul­tina­tion­als’ profits where they make their sales, is imple­men­ted.

While the pro­cess is pro­gress­ing at the Paris-based inter­na­tional organ­isa­tion, there are few signs that the US Con­gress will rat­ify any agree­ment even if the Biden admin­is­tra­tion were to sign up.

Neil Ross, asso­ciate dir­ector of policy at industry group TechUK, rejec­ted the sug­ges­tion that busi­nesses would seek to cir­cum­vent the tax as «sur­pris­ing and unfoun­ded». He added: «From our per­spect­ive, com­pan­ies are try­ing to get clar­ity and inform­a­tion out of HMRC to com­ply. But HMRC was very slow and not effect­ively resourced».

But he agreed that the digital ser­vices tax was a «second-best option . . . Polit­ical atten­tion should be focused on get­ting the OECD frame­work agreed».

The Treas­ury and HMRC also dis­missed the PAC’s warn­ing that com­pan­ies would cir­cum­vent the tax, point­ing out it was rel­at­ively accessible to oper­ate.

www.sba.tax

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...
4 comments
Read more

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...
2 comments
Read more

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...
3 comments
Read more