Skip to main content

Tremors in the stock market.

 

SVB logo
The fail­ure of Sil­icon Val­ley Bank tore into global mar­kets yes­ter­day, with investors rip­ping up their fore­casts for fur­ther interest rate rises and dump­ing bank stocks around the world. Gov­ern­ment bond prices soared as fund man­agers bet that the US Fed­eral Reserve would leave rates unchanged to steady the fin­an­cial sys­tem. As recently as last week, mar­kets were braced for another half-per­cent­age point rise at this month’s mon­et­ary policy meet­ing. The two-year Treas­ury yield, which moves inversely to prices, had been on course for its biggest one-day fall since 1987 after slip­ping below 4 per cent.

US pres­id­ent Joe Biden sought to reas­sure Amer­ic­ans that their money was safe, vow­ing to do «whatever is needed» to pro­tect their depos­its. Investors were divided on what fur­ther action may be needed to shore up con­fid­ence in other US banks regarded as vul­ner­able to higher interest rates and flighty depos­its. Hedge fund man­ager Bill Ack­man called for the gov­ern­ment to «expli­citly guar­an­tee all depos­its now. Hours mat­ter.» But his coun­ter­part Ken Griffin, founder of Cit­adel, told the Fin­an­cial Times that the Biden admin­is­tra­tion’s move to back­stop all depos­its at SVB had been wrong-headed.

As fear spread, shares in First Repub­lic, another Cali­for­nia-based lender, dropped 77 per cent. The KBW banks index, which includes lar­ger lenders, fell 11 per cent. Con­ta­gion spread to Europe, where the Stoxx banks index fell a fur­ther 6.5 per cent. The fail­ure of SVB and clos­ure of Sig­na­ture Bank come just months after a short­lived crisis in UK gov­ern­ment bonds, under­lin­ing the risks bur­ied in the fin­an­cial sys­tem as cent­ral banks rap­idly lift bor­row­ing costs.

Investors and ana­lysts said poli­cy­makers would need to tread care­fully as they sought to lower infla­tion. Gold­man Sachs said that it no longer expec­ted any rate increase at the Fed’s meet­ing this month «in light of recent stress in the bank­ing sys­tem».

Comments

  1. In a way I understand these reactions. But in another way, why are we always reacting like this? Ok, a big bank is offline now, maybe for good. But why do all the other banks have to suffer even if there's no actual reason for it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Even seasoned investors react this way when something (apparently) this big happens. It's how the market will always react. It's a time of uncertainty and a good time to make money. Just try to take advantage of it and don't go to the fear side.

      Delete
  2. First Republic is a good investment right now seeing as their stock is down 77%. It carries a certain level of risk but what doesn't? If you want to make money this is one of the moments to invest.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...