The Serious Fraud Office has abandoned its prosecution of three former executives at outsourcer G4S for allegedly defrauding the government over a prisoner-tagging contract after delays left the case in turmoil almost a decade after it began. Yesterday the SFO’s barrister, Crispin Aylett KC, said it was «no longer in the public interest» to proceed with the case, adding the «decision to drop » had not been taken «either quickly or lightly». Mr Justice Jeremy Johnson recorded not guilty verdicts against the men, who he said had been «subject to the jeopardy of criminal investigation and prosecution for around 10 years». It had opened the inquiry into G4S’s prisoner tagging contract in 2013.The men were originally set to stand trial in January last year but problems with disclosure of evidence to the defence sent the SFO’s case spiralling into disarray. On Monday, Aylett said the time and money that would need to be spent on sifting and handing relevant evidence to the defence meant continuing was not feasible. « We have determined it is no longer in the public interest to continue this prosecution». The failed prosecution comes after G4S entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the SFO.
Its care and justice unit paid £44mn in 2020 to settle three counts of fraud, for lying to the Ministry of Justice about the true extent of profits on a prisoner tagging contract.
And this is why things like these keep happening. It takes 10+ years to get somewhere or it just goes away on its own after some time. Of course this will keep happening...
ReplyDeleteExactly! If you started this, take it to the end, don't just tell us it's been 10 years and there's no money for this. Why have you wasted the time and money then?
DeleteWhat a waste of money, energy and time? And for what? To just say you know what, 10 years of "jeopardy of criminal investigation and prosecution" is enough for them. They've suffered enough.
ReplyDeleteYeah, what kind of justice is that? And this is just one case, there are countless others that end this way. The more it drags on the better chances the guilty parties have of getting away with it. Disappointed in how they handled this.
Delete