Skip to main content

The renewable funding package is too low.

Renewable
 The government has been told that a £205 million annual funding package announced yesterday for the next batch of renewable power projects will be insufficient to spur the required investment.

Proposed wind, solar, tidal and geothermal electricity projects are expected to compete in this year’s auction for contracts that guarantee them a fixed price for electricity.

The £205 million budget is the government’s estimate of the maximum subsidies required for the contracts in any year based on its electricity price forecasts.

Renewable UK, the industry body, said: «The budget and parameters set for this year’s auction are too low and too tight to unlock all the potential investment in wind, solar and tidal stream projects which the industry could deliver».

The auction also caps the maximum fixed price developers of each technology can seek. Renewables groups had hoped that these wind and solar caps would increase slightly while remaining well below wholesale prices to reflect surging costs of raw materials and financing, but no such change was made.

Jamie Maule, an analyst at Cornwall Insight, said: «Investors and developers are rightly worried about the government’s cap going into the. If an increase in the return cannot compensate for the high cost of capital, the money will not be enough for projects to be successful. It could act to stifle competition and deter investors and developers from bidding for renewable projects».

www.sba.tax

Comments

  1. If you really want these projects to happen then you need to invest proper money into them. Of course £205 million is not enough, not right now, with all that's going on in the world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wonder how much would be needed yearly? £300 million? More? It's pretty clear, even to regular people that don't know much about this, that the numbers don't add up at all. Such technology and improvements will cost a decent penny but offer very good returns in time.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...