Skip to main content

Tesco will increase the supplier's fees for online sales.

 

Tesco logo
The FTSE 100 grocer told suppliers last week they would have to shoulder new Amazon-style' fulfilment fees' per item sold on Tesco. The proposed fees are understood to be 12p per item for branded goods and 5p for own brand, but Tesco has since said the numbers are up for negotiation with each supplier. The smallest suppliers - those with £250,000 or fewer contracts - are set to be exempt. Still, businesses such as fruit and vegetable growers, which sell via more enormous intermediaries, fear the costs will trickle down to them. Lee Stiles of the Lea Valley Growers Association, representing tomato and cucumber growers in the Essex-Hertfordshire border, said the larger distributors would inevitably pass costs down the line.

Ged Futter, a former Asda buyer who advises suppliers via his consultancy The Retail Mind, said the move was a multi-million-pound "money grab" from Tesco. "They've got gaps on their shelves because they won't pay suppliers to put up the needed costs," he said. "Now, on top of that, they're expecting the same suppliers to pay Tesco for the privilege of using online. In response, Tesco highlighted new support it has given to British farmers this year, including higher payments to chilled vegetable growers.

The new terms by Tesco could apply as early as Monday, but the supermarket said there was no deadline to sign up. The fees will apply per item to all goods sold on Tesco's UK or Irish website and all orders made through Booker, Tesco's wholesale arm for retail and catering customers.

www.sba.tax

Labels:

Comments

  1. Liam12 March 2023 at 09:52

    Probably not the best timing for this. Tesco is making a mistake. Instead of doing this now it would be better to just let suppliers know that this may be coming 1 year from now. That they will try to prolong this "grace" period as long as they can because they value their suppliers. Wouldn't that sound much better?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chris12 March 2023 at 10:17

      It would. Most suppliers get it. They know sometimes prices and costs go up. But they hate being forced into this. And so quickly. Give them time. Show them you care about them as well as about yourself, Tesco.

      Delete
    2. Marshall12 March 2023 at 10:28

      Tesco is now actively alienating suppliers and some will find new solutions. Not today, but in a month, 3, 6 they will be gone.

      Delete
  2. Jeremy12 March 2023 at 11:35

    Tesco forgets that suppliers are very important for their business and they should be treated with care and respect. Once you stop doing this, you will lose revenue. This measure will have the exact opposite effect: it will eventually lead to lost revenue.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...
4 comments
Read more

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...
3 comments
Read more

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...
2 comments
Read more