Skip to main content

Revolut defends its revenues.

 

Revolut logo
Revolut has said its 2021 revenues are «not in question» despite concerns from external auditors about the «completeness and occurrence» of close to £500 million worth of turnover. The company, one of Britain’s most valuable start-ups, alleged that its annual accounts had been «misreported» in articles which said auditors from BDO had been unable to verify about three-quarters of its 2021 sales. Revolut claimed that «some of the reporting on Wednesday incorrectly reported BDO’s audit opinion». It alleged that BDO was saying it could not confirm precisely which revenue stream funds were coming from rather than casting doubt on the volume of revenue reported.

 Revolut said it stood by the comments, which have put BDO in a difficult position. Revolut was founded in the UK in 2015, offering transfers and foreign exchange services as it sought to outpace and undercut the large incumbent banks. The delays came after the quality of the 2020 audit by BDO came under review by the Financial Reporting Council, the regulator. The problems highlighted by BDO related to issues with Revolut’s IT system which are understood to have created difficulties with reconciliation. This accounting process compares two sets of records to ensure the figures are correct and in agreement.

A payments industry veteran, who asked not to be named, said reconciliation is a «fundamental requirement of any financial platform» and that the audit qualification had raised new questions about Revolut’s efforts to secure a UK banking licence, which would allow it to expand its range of services for customers in Britain. «How can the company not know its subscription revenue?» he wrote on Twitter. Mikko Salovaara, the group chief financial officer of Revolut, said this week that the issues were down to «an IT system that wasn’t scaled» to meet the company’s rapid growth. The company indicated the problems were resolved in mid-2021, and Salovaara has said he did not expect it to be a «recurring issue».

www.sba.tax

Comments

  1. So many companies grow way too fast and their IT systems can't seem to keep up. Let's hope this is the case here and we are not dealing with something else entirely.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I always wonder why such companies don't just get an outside team to fix their IT system and improve it as they go. I mean, just invest in this because it's one of (if not the most) important aspects of such a business. You can't afford to have problems here.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...