Skip to main content

Duty freezes on draught beer.

 

Pub
«Brit­ish ale is warm, but the duty on a pint is frozen,» Hunt told MPs. He added that the duty on draught products in pubs would be up to 11p lower than that of super­mar­kets. The 10.1 per cent rise in duty will hit demand for other bever­ages, includ­ing bottled beer, wines and spir­its, that do not bene­fit from tax relief, warned industry groups. A long-awaited shake-up of the duty sys­tem also planned for August, which will tax drinks in rela­tion to their alco­hol con­tent, will mean the wine will be hit by an even big­ger tax increase of about 20 per cent, or 44p a bottle, accord­ing to the Wine and Spirit Trade Asso­ci­ation.

«Duty on non-draught beer will rise, and the meas­ures intro­duced today won’t rebal­ance the cata­strophic impact soar­ing infla­tion and unfair energy con­tracts on both pubs and the brew­er­ies that sup­ply them,» McClar­kin added. «Where we save in one area, we’re get­ting hit in another area,» said Oliver Robin­son, man­aging dir­ector of Robin­sons Brew­ery & Pubs, who said the rise in cor­por­a­tion tax to 25 per cent from April would out­weigh the bene­fits of draught relief. A com­bin­a­tion of the higher alco­hol duty and the higher shake-up means taxes on port and sherry will rise 44 per cent, while the 20 per cent tax increase on wine would be its most significant in nearly 50 years, accord­ing to the WSTA. Mark Kent, chief exec­ut­ive of the Scotch Whisky Asso­ci­ation, said a «his­toric blow» had been dealt to the industry by the lack of a wider alco­hol duty freeze.

www.sba.tax

Labels:

Comments

  1. Gerard16 March 2023 at 12:20

    I understand they need money and it makes a bit of sense to tax drinks based on their alcohol content but maybe it should have been 20%. Maybe 10% or such. It seems way too much.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brian16 March 2023 at 13:21

      These measures will affect sales and the whole industry will be done for at least an year and they will get less tax so we'll be where we started. They could have increased it by 5% which would have been much better and then increased it again in 3 by another 5-10%.

      Delete
    2. Jonathan16 March 2023 at 14:03

      Even a 7-8% increase now and another one in 1 year would have been better. They need money but this isn’t the best way to get it, I think.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...
4 comments
Read more

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...
3 comments
Read more

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...
2 comments
Read more