Skip to main content

AI revolution.

 

AI
There’s a colossal shift going on in arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence — but it’s not the one some might think. While advanced lan­guage-gen­er­at­ing sys­tems and chat­bots have dom­in­ated news head­lines, private AI com­pan­ies have quietly entrenched their power. Recent devel­op­ments mean that a hand­ful of indi­vidu­als and cor­por­a­tions now con­trol much of the resources and know­ledge in the sec­tor — and will ulti­mately shape its impact on our col­lect­ive future.

The phe­nomenon, which AI experts refer to as «indus­trial cap­ture», was quan­ti­fied in a paper pub­lished by research­ers from the Mas­sachu­setts Insti­tute of Tech­no­logy in the journal Sci­ence this month, call­ing on poli­cy­makers to pay closer atten­tion. Its data is increas­ingly cru­cial. Gen­er­at­ive AI — the tech­no­logy under­ly­ing the likes of Chat­GPT — is being embed­ded into soft­ware used by bil­lions of people, such as Microsoft Office, Google Docs and Gmail. And busi­nesses from law firms to the media and edu­ca­tional insti­tu­tions are being upen­ded by its intro­duc­tion.

The MIT researchers found that almost 70 per cent of AI PhDs went to work for com­pan­ies in 2020, com­pared with 21 per cent in 2004. In par­tic­u­lar, he said aca­dem­ics were unable to build large lan­guage mod­els like GPT-4, a type of AI soft­ware that gen­er­ates plaus­ible and detailed text by pre­dict­ing the next word in a sen­tence with high accur­acy. The tech­nique requires enorm­ous amounts of data and com­put­ing power that primar­ily only large tech­no­logy com­pan­ies like Google, Microsoft and Amazon have access to. Ahmed found com­pan­ies’ share of the biggest AI mod­els had gone from 11 per cent in 2010 to 96 per cent in 2021.

A lack of access means research­ers can­not rep­lic­ate the mod­els built-in cor­por­ate labs and can, there­fore, neither probe nor audit them for poten­tial harms and biases very eas­ily.

The paper’s data also showed a big dis­par­ity between pub­lic and private invest­ment in AI tech­no­logy. In 2021, non-defence US gov­ern­ment agen­cies alloc­ated $1.5bn to AI. The European Com­mis­sion planned to spend €1bn. Mean­while, the private sec­tor inves­ted more than $340bn on AI in 2021.

In 2019, OpenAI pivoted from a non­profit into a profit­mak­ing enter­prise with a $1bn invest­ment from Microsoft, cit­ing a need «to increase our invest­ments in com­pute and tal­ent rap­idly».

The con­sequences of this shift are man­i­fold. First, it means pub­lic altern­at­ives to cor­por­ate AI tech, such as mod­els and data sets, are becom­ing increas­ingly scarce. And new applic­a­tions are likely to be com­mer­cially driven rather than in the broader pub­lic interest, sev­eral research­ers poin­ted out. Hanna, whose work is fun­ded by non-profits, agrees. «If you want to work on spe­cial­ised AI tasks like ensur­ing biod­iversity, or cli­mate sci­ence or agri­cul­ture, there is not a lot of appet­ite for that,» she said.

Meredith Whit­taker, pres­id­ent of encryp­ted app Sig­nal, has com­pared the situ­ation with the US mil­it­ary’s dom­in­ance over sci­entific research dur­ing the cold war in a sem­inal paper in 2021. «It is here, in these darker his­tor­ies, that we con­front the steep cost of cap­ture — whether mil­it­ary or indus­trial,» she wrote. «And its per­il­ous implic­a­tions for aca­demic free­dom . . . cap­able of hold­ing power to account».

Resoomed from original article of Mrs Madhumita Murgia Financial Times

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...
4 comments
Read more

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...
2 comments
Read more

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...
3 comments
Read more