There’s a colossal shift going on in artificial intelligence — but it’s not the one some might think. While advanced language-generating systems and chatbots have dominated news headlines, private AI companies have quietly entrenched their power. Recent developments mean that a handful of individuals and corporations now control much of the resources and knowledge in the sector — and will ultimately shape its impact on our collective future.
The phenomenon, which AI experts refer to as «industrial capture», was quantified in a paper published by researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the journal Science this month, calling on policymakers to pay closer attention. Its data is increasingly crucial. Generative AI — the technology underlying the likes of ChatGPT — is being embedded into software used by billions of people, such as Microsoft Office, Google Docs and Gmail. And businesses from law firms to the media and educational institutions are being upended by its introduction.
The MIT researchers found that almost 70 per cent of AI PhDs went to work for companies in 2020, compared with 21 per cent in 2004. In particular, he said academics were unable to build large language models like GPT-4, a type of AI software that generates plausible and detailed text by predicting the next word in a sentence with high accuracy. The technique requires enormous amounts of data and computing power that primarily only large technology companies like Google, Microsoft and Amazon have access to. Ahmed found companies’ share of the biggest AI models had gone from 11 per cent in 2010 to 96 per cent in 2021.
A lack of access means researchers cannot replicate the models built-in corporate labs and can, therefore, neither probe nor audit them for potential harms and biases very easily.
The paper’s data also showed a big disparity between public and private investment in AI technology. In 2021, non-defence US government agencies allocated $1.5bn to AI. The European Commission planned to spend €1bn. Meanwhile, the private sector invested more than $340bn on AI in 2021.
In 2019, OpenAI pivoted from a nonprofit into a profitmaking enterprise with a $1bn investment from Microsoft, citing a need «to increase our investments in compute and talent rapidly».
The consequences of this shift are manifold. First, it means public alternatives to corporate AI tech, such as models and data sets, are becoming increasingly scarce. And new applications are likely to be commercially driven rather than in the broader public interest, several researchers pointed out. Hanna, whose work is funded by non-profits, agrees. «If you want to work on specialised AI tasks like ensuring biodiversity, or climate science or agriculture, there is not a lot of appetite for that,» she said.
Meredith Whittaker, president of encrypted app Signal, has compared the situation with the US military’s dominance over scientific research during the cold war in a seminal paper in 2021. «It is here, in these darker histories, that we confront the steep cost of capture — whether military or industrial,» she wrote. «And its perilous implications for academic freedom . . . capable of holding power to account».
Resoomed from original article of Mrs Madhumita Murgia Financial Times
Comments
Post a Comment