Skip to main content

A group of air­lines is plan­ning to sue the Dutch gov­ern­ment for Schiphol airport.

 

KLM airplane
A group of air­lines is plan­ning to sue the Dutch gov­ern­ment for cut­ting flights at Ams­ter­dam’s Schiphol air­port in a push­back against efforts to reduce the industry’s pol­lu­tion and noise levels. He called on the gov­ern­ment to work with air­lines «to meet noise and emis­sions reduc­tion goals while restor­ing employ­ment». They said the gov­ern­ment’s «uni­lat­eral and sud­den» decision to cut Schiphol’s capa­city from 500,000 to 460,000 annual flights was «incom­pre­hens­ible». Air­lines had already made «mult­i­bil­lion euros invest­ments» in redu­cing car­bon emis­sions, they said, adding that the gov­ern­ment had not con­sidered «altern­at­ive work­able solu­tions to effect noise reduc­tion».

KLM Group, which includes KLM, KLM City­hop­per, Mar­tin­air and Transavia, accounts for nearly 60 per cent of traffic at Schiphol, which handled more than 52mn pas­sen­gers in 2022. Royal Schiphol Group, the air­port oper­ator, is major­ity owned by the Dutch state and announced the decision last month. The Dutch gov­ern­ment said its long­stand­ing prac­tice of not enfor­cing noise and pol­lu­tion lim­its had to end because of the legal rights of people liv­ing close to the air­port.

www.sba.tax

Comments

  1. I agree that reducing the number of annual flights suddenly is not a good idea at all, especially since airlines have already shown they are committed to reducing carbon emissions. We can't just reduce carbon emissions out of thin air, in 2 days. It will take some time and drastic decisions are not helpful in the least.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They are right to sue the government who made a huge error in this case. They can't just decide what goes and stays like this. I wasn't expecting this to happen in Holland. Sounds more like something that would happen in a 3rd world country.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

US FED rate rise.

  The US Federal Reserve officials have indicated that they plan to resume increasing interest rates to control inflation in the world's biggest economy. During the June meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee reached a consensus to keep interest rates stable for the time being to evaluate whether further tightening of policy would be necessary. However, the majority of the committee anticipates that additional rate increases will be required in the future. The minutes of the meeting have recently been made public. According to the minutes, most participants believed maintaining the federal funds rate at 5 to 5.25 per cent was appropriate or acceptable, despite some individuals wanting to raise the acceleration due to slow progress in cooling inflation. Although Fed forecasts predicted a mild recession starting later in the year, policymakers faced challenges in interpreting data that showed a tight job market and only slight improvements in inflation. Additionally, officials gr...

EU business slide.

  S&P Global’s flash eurozone composite purchasing managers’ index, a key gauge of business conditions for the manufacturing and services sector, fell 1 point to 47.1, figures showed yesterday. That is its lowest level since November 2020 and the fourth consecutive month below the crucial 50 mark separating growth from contraction. One of the few bright spots in the survey was that companies in all sectors reported a slight easing of cost pressures, price growth and supply chain constraints. However, prices charged for goods and services still rose at the sixth fastest rate since such data started in 2002. Jobs growth increased marginally from October but remained low compared with the past 18 months. Following a few months of falling price pressure in manufacturing and services, the October print shows an overall stabilisation said Jens Eisenschmidt, chief European economist at Morgan Stanley. However, German businesses, at the hub of Europe’s energy crisis, reported that manu...

Tariffs on UK electric cars.

  The European Commission has confirmed that it will continue with its plan to impose tariffs on electric cars exported between the UK and EU starting next year. This is due to the "rules of origin" requirement that mandates EVs traded across the English Channel to have 60% of their battery and 45% of their parts sourced from the EU or UK or face a 10% tariff. A senior Commission official, Richard Szostak, recently informed parliamentarians from the UK and EU that the bloc's battery investment has significantly declined, making the tariffs necessary to encourage domestic production. In 2022, the EU's share of global investment in battery production shrank from 41% to only 2% after the US offered substantial subsidies through its Inflation Reduction Act. Starting in 2024, car manufacturers in the UK will need to have 22% of their sales come from zero-emission vehicles, which means they may need to import EVs from the continent to meet this requirement. If EU carmakers ...