‘Braun is as credible as Baron Münchhausen,’ says a German lawmaker, referring to the 18th-century
nobleman famous for outlandish tales. Wirecard chief executive Markus Braun had barely managed to reassure shareholders rattled by news of an internal fraud probe in 2019 when the lawyers leading it all but called him a liar. The letter is one of the several examples of Braun being accused of making incorrect, and misleading statements to investors, an FT analysis of Wirecard emails and other documents reveals. The incidents raise further questions about Braun’s credibility, just as he is due to take the stand at the Munich trial examining the company’s failure.
«A CEO who does not notice that his most important clients are not real may exist in fiction, but I am certain that Braun was very aware of his company’s situation». So far, Braun has not made a statement in court. Instead, Braun has been implicated heavily by one of his co-defendants, the former Dubai-based executive Oliver Bellenhaus.
With a lack of conclusive evidence that Braun knew about or was directly involved in the alleged fraud, the trial, to an extent, hinges on which man the panel of five judges believes. Internal emails and other documents reviewed by the FT suggest that factual statements by Braun were not always truthful and were sometimes challenged by lawyers hired by the group and by its auditors and supervisory board. After an FT story in January 2019 reported that a compliance probe by Rajah & Tann had found evidence indicating «serious offences of forgery and/ or of falsification of accounts», Braun told analysts that the investigation had not found «any proof, or conclusive findings, that any of these allegations are true» and was not expected to do so. The firm said it disagreed with Wirecard and Braun’s view that it «has not made, and is not expected to make, any findings of material non-compliance as to the governance and accounting practices of any Wirecard subsidiary or employee».
Rajah & Tann said Braun and Wirecard’s public position «causes us concern» and urged the company to stop making public statements about the investigation «until after our final report has been issued». One year on, it was KPMG’s turn to tell Braun that his depiction of facts was not in line with reality.
The comparison with Baron Münchhausen si quite accurate I think. This man can't be trusted because it's in his interest to lie and spin the facts. It will be interesting to hear what he has to say...
ReplyDeleteThey won't get any good information out of him, that's for sure. But maybe he will make a mistake, who knows?
Delete