Skip to main content

The end of cheap flights.

Air­line pas­sen­gers face higher fares under newly strengthened EU rules designed to tackle avi­ation

Airplane on sunset

emis­sions in a sign that the era of super low-cost flights may be about to end. The EU wants to force car­bon­in­tens­ive indus­tries to pay more for their pol­lu­tion with ticket prices rising as much as €10 per return flight because of increased levies on avi­ation emis­sions, accord­ing to ana­lysts. EU law­makers have given ini­tial approval to an update of the bloc’s car­bon pri­cing rules, for­cing indus­tries includ­ing avi­ation to buy enough allow­ances to cover their pol­lu­tion under the emis­sions trad­ing sys­tem. The total num­ber of allow­ances in the sys­tem will also fall over time, which ana­lysts expect to drive up prices.

The price of allow­ances in the EU sys­tem was trad­ing at close to their all­time highs, near €100 a tonne on Fri­day. Rev­en­ues from the ETS will be put towards schemes to boost the use of sus­tain­able avi­ation fuels. Europe’s emis­sions trad­ing sys­tem is a flag­ship ele­ment of the EU’s plan to cut green­house gas emis­sions by 55 per cent by 2030, com­pared with 1990 levels. Envir­on­mental groups said the scheme was an effect­ive way to con­trol car­bon emis­sions.

«Car­bon pri­cing is an essen­tial tool for emis­sions reduc­tion in Europe. it’s only right that air­lines pay their fair share for emis­sions,» said Jo Dardenne, avi­ation dir­ector at Trans­port & Envir­on­ment, an NGO. Bas Eick­hout, a Green MEP, has pushed for free allow­ances to be phased out as soon as pos­sible, call­ing them a «fossil fuel sub­sidy».

www.sba.tax

Comments

  1. Carbon pricing should be a norm everywhere, in everything. We should pay a higher price for activities that hurt the planet. We should be allowed to do some of them but we should also pay the real price for it and not a "reduced" price.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seth Godin spoke about this a while back saying that we must put a monetary value on pollution. The biggest problem is that plastic is so cheap and that's why we use it so much. Pay the real price for plastic (which includes the pollution it brings) and then we won't use it as much. Carbon pricing works in the same way.

      Delete
    2. Exactly! Seth Godin is right. Until we pay the real prices for our actions and materials we won't get anywhere. Cheap flights should be a thing of the past as is plastic usage. Make it so it's expensive to use plastic and at the same time find alternatives that are as good or better.

      Delete
  2. Sorry to see cheap flights going away but I understand why this must happen. For too long we have just thought about our wallets and our own pleasures and didn't stop to think what will happen to this planet in 30-50 years from now? Where will our kids and grandkids live if we continue like this?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...