Skip to main content

German FX investigation finds actions of bad faith.

 An invest­ig­a­tion into mis-selling has found that staff acted in «bad faith» for years, push­ing smal­ler

Forex trader.

Span­ish com­pan­ies to buy highly com­plex deriv­at­ives. A Deutsche Bank probe into the mis­selling of risky for­eign exchange deriv­at­ives in Spain has found that staff acted disin­genu­ously, exploited flaws in the bank’s con­trols and broke EU rules, accord­ing to people with know­ledge of the report. One of the people said employ­ees acted in «bad faith» over the years, push­ing small and medium-sized Span­ish com­pan­ies to buy highly com­plex for­eign exchange deriv­at­ives. The products, pro­moted as safe and cheap, were meant to hedge against for­eign exchange risks.

They gen­er­ated huge profits for Deutsche but exposed cli­ents to extens­ive risk and crip­pling losses in some cases. A second per­son famil­iar with the probe described some of the Deutsche staff con­duct as «very unfor­tu­nate». The mis­con­duct, which involved a Lon­don desk of Deutsche’s invest­ment bank, as well as Span­ish oper­a­tions at its inter­na­tional private unit, spanned sev­eral years until 2019. Deutsche Bank told the FT in a state­ment that it took «appro­pri­ate action» after it reviewed «parts of our sales activ­it­ies in struc­tured FX deriv­at­ives», adding that it was «improv­ing our pro­cesses and enhan­cing our con­trols».

The products in ques­tion were types of for­eign exchange swaps called tar­geted accrual redemp­tion notes and for­wards. Deutsche pitched them as a cheaper way to hedge cur­rency risk. Small com­pan­ies were told the products were «zero premium» with no ini­tial cost, accord­ing to people famil­iar with the details. In a stable cur­rency mar­ket, the deriv­at­ives some­times benefited cli­ents.

www.sba.tax

Comments

  1. It's shocking and disappointing to hear of these kinds of people working for such large institutions like Deutsche Bank. It shows a lack of control over all branches and it dilutes the brand of this bank.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm curious if these Spanish clients will receive any compensation for this.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...