The global banking industry has warned that developing country debt piles have hit a fresh high,
adding to fears of a wave of defaults this year. The combined government, household, corporate and financial sector debts of 30 large low- and middle-income countries rose to $98tn at the end of December, as their currencies slumped against the dollar. The debt burden for the 30 countries was up from $96tn a year earlier and from $75tn in 2019 before the pandemic began, the IIF, a trade body for the global banking industry, said in the latest edition of its quarterly Global Debt Monitor. Government debts alone were equal to almost 65 per cent of gross domestic product by the end of 2022, an increase of 10 percentage points over prepandemic levels and the highest-ever year-end total.
The dollar soared against most emerging market and advanced economy currencies throughout 2022, raising the cost of meeting existing debt obligations, many of which are denominated in the US currency. The dollar's rise followed a series of aggressive interest rate increases to combat high inflation from the US Federal Reserve, which had a knock-on impact on global borrowing costs. The strength of the dollar against most emerging market currencies last year led investors to dump emerging market stocks and bonds. This trend went into reverse last October after the dollar weakened.
However, recent data on the US economy suggesting inflation and interest rates may remain high for longer than previously expected has led to a fresh bout of dollar strength. Emre Tiftik, an IIF economist, said the dollar's strength had left low-income countries facing extra funding costs because many relied heavily on dollardenominated funding to secure interest from global investors. As a result, the ratio of debt service prices to government revenues had risen to «exceptional levels», Parker said. In advanced economies, total debt declined by almost $6tn to just under $201tn, leaving the total global debt burden down slightly, from $303tn at the end of 2021 to below $300tn at the end of last year.
Even so, the Fed is not the only institution we need to help fight inflation, especially given the supply disruptions from the pandemic and the war in Ukraine. The Fed, by raising interest rates, can push down demand, but it cannot push up supply. And Adam Shapiro, an economist at the San Francisco Fed, estimates that about 40 per cent of inflation is supply-driven, 40 per cent is demand-driven, and the other 20 per cent is ambiguous. Given that reality, the Fed alone cannot get inflation back to the 2 per cent target.
Its primary tool to rein in inflation is the federal funds' rate that influences the interest rates at which consumers and businesses borrow. The Fed rate hikes work through financial markets, and monetary policy is only one factor determining the price of debt, meaning that the central bank's primary tool is not a precise one. As a result, many could pay down debt during the pandemic.
Business fixed investment has contracted since the second quarter of last year, and housing starts plunged by 20 per cent. However, the effects on the labour market are modest, even in areas like construction. Companies are likely holding on to workers because it has been hard to rehire. That should help ease the labour shortages and push down on inflation, even though they will increase demand.
Again, the Fed had no influence on immigration policy. The best way to solve a labour shortage is with more workers, not fewer customers. The US infrastructure bill, the Chips Act to boost domestic semiconductor production, and the Inflation Reduction Act all have elements that will help with inflation, especially in the future, by creating or fortifying supply. At the same time, demand management is not an efficient way to deal with supply-driven inflation.
We shouldn't even rely on the Fed alone to get inflation back to normal levels. It's clear they are just part of the solution.
ReplyDelete