Skip to main content

Credit Suisse probed over leaked accounts.

 Swiss pro­sec­utors have opened a crim­inal probe into the leak of thou­sands of account details at Credit Suisse last

Credit Suisse

year, in a case that is likely to have a chilling effect on whis­tleblow­ing in the secret­ive alpine coun­try.

Switzer­land’s Fed­eral pro­sec­utor said yes­ter­day it was invest­ig­at­ing pos­sible cor­por­ate espi­on­age and breaches of the coun­try’s bank­ing secrecy laws in rela­tion to an inter­na­tional invest­ig­a­tion by a con­sor­tium of journ­al­ists into dirty money last Feb­ru­ary.
A series of art­icles pub­lished by organ­isa­tions includ­ing the Süd­deutsche Zei­tung, The New York Times, The Guard­ian and Le Monde, under the tagline «Suisse Secrets», claimed to expose accounts at Credit Suisse hold­ing bil­lions of dol­lars on behalf of crim­in­als and inter­na­tional human rights abusers.
The leak, which in total covered inform­a­tion on more than 18,000 Credit Suisse accounts, was the single biggest in Swiss bank­ing his­tory.
Bank Secrecy Act if they dis­close, dis­sem­in­ate or pub­lish inform­a­tion on the cli­ents of Swiss banks. There is no pub­lic interest exemp­tion.
The bank said yes­ter­day that Credit Suisse «could not com­ment on ongo­ing legal pro­ced­ures».

Comments

  1. I wonder why they waited this long to do this. It was clear that things were and are not in order at Credit Suisse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You might be right and they are trying to hide something and/or protect some people (from the bank and clients of the bank). That could be the case or they just didn't have enough evidence to open the case against CS.

      Delete
    2. @Bradley That seems to be the case. Lots of shady people use swiss banks to do their dirty work and unfortunately, there are lots of people who protect them. Let's see what prosecutors discover.

      Delete
    3. @Martin I don't have high hopes something major will happen because CS has already had plenty of time to cover their tracks and make sure the really bad things they did aren't easily available.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...