Skip to main content

Apple pos­ted a decline in quarterly revenues.

 Apple pos­ted a decline in quarterly rev­en­ues for the first time in three and a half years after «sig­ni­fic­ant» sup­ply chain dis­rup­tions in China delayed deliv­er­ies of iPhones dur­ing the import­ant hol­i­day

Iphone

period. The worse than expec­ted per­form­ance high­lighted Apple’s depend­ence on China for man­u­fac­tur­ing and came after ship­ments of its high-end iPhones were hit by an out­break of Covid-19 at an assembly hub run by part­ner Fox­conn in Zheng­zhou. Apple pos­ted total rev­en­ues of $117.2bn for the latest quarter, a fall of 5.5 per cent com­pared with the same period of 2021 and below ana­lyst fore­casts for $121.1bn. «In total, we expect our March quarter year-over-year rev­enue per­form­ance to be sim­ilar to the Decem­ber quarter,» Cook said, adding that sales of Macs and iPads would prob­ably fall by double digits in part because of a «chal­len­ging» eco­nomic envir­on­ment.

Shares of Apple fell by more than 3 per cent in after-hours trad­ing on Thursday but bounced back by the same amount yes­ter­day morn­ing. Apple’s rev­enue short­fall came as Amazon and Alpha­bet poin­ted to fur­ther weak­en­ing in some core mar­kets in the latest quarter. Alpha­bet’s rev­enue came in below expect­a­tions as its advert­ising rev­enue fell for only the second time, partly because of the strength of the US dol­lar and com­par­is­ons with rapid growth a year before. Des­pite the lacklustre earn­ings and out­look; Apple did not announce any job cuts or a cost-cut­ting pro­gramme, mark­ing it out as the only large tech com­pany to avoid mass redund­an­cies.

Apple did not provide any for­ward guid­ance, something it has not done for three years owing to what it describes as pan­demic uncer­tainty.

www.sba.tax

Comments

  1. If Apple sticks to their guns and doesn't fire people then they will earn even more trust from its clients. Right now, they are the only large tech company that hasn't felt the need to lay off people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Huge companies like Microsoft just fired so many people and it makes no sense. Their profits are immense so they would have clearly done very well even with those 10000+ people. It's disappointing and a bad look for such companies to just fire people as soon as things are not going so well.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...