Skip to main content

EU drawn up plans to hit US inflation reduction act.

 Brus­sels has drawn up plans to hit back at the $369bn US Infla­tion Reduc­tion Act by unwind­ing state aid curbs to allow tax cred­its for green invest­ment.

EU

The EU is plan­ning to hit back at the US’s $369bn Infla­tion Reduc­tion Act by unwind­ing state aid restric­tions to allow a wave of tax cred­its for green invest­ment.

Under a draft plan seen by the Fin­an­cial Times, the European Com­mis­sion will fur­ther relax rules to sup­port state sup­port of new pro­duc­tion facil­it­ies in green sec­tors, includ­ing via the cre­ation of tax bene­fits. But the move strays into con­tro­ver­sial ter­rit­ory within the EU, as it will be far easier for deep-pock­eted coun­tries such as Ger­many to dole out fiscal incent­ives than their fisc­ally stretched coun­ter­parts in the south.
«What we are say­ing here is that if you want to give invest­ment aid, you can give that in the form of a tax credit if that is more accom­mod­at­ing for the busi­ness,» Mar­grethe Vestager, com­mis­sion vice-pres­id­ent, told the FT.
«State aid must become more agile, we have to make decisions more quickly. But we do not need any excess­ive exten­sion of sub­sidies in the EU».
A tem­por­ary frame­work would allow greater aid for mature tech­no­lo­gies and renew­able ener­gies, going bey­ond those already defined by the EU’s renew­able energy laws to include green hydro­gen and bio­fuels, the draft pro­posal said.

Comments

  1. "State aid must become more agile, we have to make decisions more quickly" - just do this and every economy in the EU will flourish within 2 years. The faster the state responds to this, the better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But the EU also needs to allocate resources for the right projects and not just hand out money around to anyone. This money needs to be used for the right purposes not to be spent foolishly.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...