Skip to main content

Croatia adopted Euro.

 

Croatia  euro

Ivo Božić, a stallholder selling trinkets at the Christmas market in Croatia’s capital Zagreb, is used to handling multiple currencies and thinks the country’s adoption of the euro will be a success. Croatia’s adoption of the euro on January 1 was a milestone for a nation of 4mn that has long strived for closer integration with the rest of the EU. It becomes the 20th country to use the single currency and will join Europe’s border-free Schengen zone. The switch from the kuna should bring benefits, said economists, because Croatia relies on the single currency area for more than half its external trade, two-thirds of foreign direct investment and about 70 per cent of its tourists.

Christine Lagarde, European Central Bank president, called the addition «a vote of confidence for the euro area» and said Croatia would benefit from the «shield of the euro». «Croatia is the country that stands to profit the most from entry into the euro-zone,» as it would eliminate foreign currency risk, said Boris Vujčić, governor of the Croatian central bank. «Foreign exchange risk in Croatia is the highest». «When your currency depreciates against the euro, it means your debt is worth more,» Vujčić told the Financial Times.

The benefits of the euro are «most visible during a crisis», Vujčić said, pointing to recent selling pressure on the Hungarian forint, Polish zloty and Czech koruna. In contrast, Croatia’s 10-year bond yield was about 3.5 per cent, lower than those of Italy and Greece and just above Spain’s. Vujčić recalled how prices soared in the former Yugoslavia and Croatia during the late 1980s and early 1990s, suggesting he would take a hawkish stance to tame the price rises that worry Europe’s policymakers. However, he admitted to a risk that Croatian consumers would blame the euro for high inflation, which hit 13.5 per cent last month.

Yet, on average, countries that have adopted the single currency have experienced only a 0.2 to 0.4 percentage point rise in inflation, albeit in periods of lower price growth. To improve transparency, shops in Croatia have had to display prices in both kuna and euro since September and will continue to do so until the end of this year. Studenac, a grocery chain, had to print 5mn new price labels. In the lead-up to the currency transition, staff had to explain to confused customers that it could only accept euros on January 1, after which both currencies would be used in parallel for two weeks. Seńczuk predicted that as well as boosting tourism, the euro would make Croatia «more attractive to foreign buyers looking for second homes».

www.sba.tax

Comments

  1. I think any country (Croatia included) needs much more time before actually going for only EURO. Kuna should remain in use for at least 1 more year. If you force EURO on people they won't like it at all and you won't get the acceptance you were counting on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. This should be a very gradual process that doesn't confuse people. Help them get used to the EURO being the only currency. This takes time. If they hurry this process it won't go well.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...