Google’s parent company will axe 12,000 staff, pushing total tech job losses in the past 12 months
above 200,000, as industry bosses concede they overextended during the pandemic’s digital boom. The industry-wide cull has affected over 50,000 people across four Big Tech companies, including Amazon, Meta and Microsoft. Apple is the largest tech company yet to announce any significant cuts. Even before the announcement from Alphabet, Google’s owner, more than 193,000 jobs had already gone at tech groups globally since the start of 2022, according to estimates from Layoffs.
«Over the past two years, we’ve seen periods of dramatic growth,» Alphabet chief executive Sundar Pichai wrote in a letter to employees. His admission is the latest by a Silicon Valley executive that tech companies erred in the wake of the pandemic by betting on continued stellar growth in sectors ranging from advertising to remote working. Alphabet’s shares rose 4.5 per cent in midday trade yesterday. The latest cuts will affect about 6 per cent of the workforce at Alphabet, which also owns autonomous car company Waymo, healthcare venture Verily and artificial intelligence researchers DeepMind.
Pichai said the roles being eliminated would «cut across Alphabet, product areas, functions, levels and regions». However, those cuts represent fewer than half of the 36,751 staff that Alphabet added in the year to September 2022, the most recent quarter for which figures are available. Alphabet’s total headcount had swelled by about 57 per cent since the beginning of 2020, to more than 185,000 in September. Since the end of 2019, Amazon’s worker count has nearly doubled, while Microsoft’s workforce grew in 2022 by more than double the previous year.
Silicon Valley giants continued their hiring last year on the assumption the historic surge in digital demand would endure. What is less straightforward is knowing how to lessen these societal harms without trampling over free speech. On both sides of the Atlantic, lawmakers are grappling with the best ways of making Big Tech more accountable. The long-awaited online safety bill, which promises to make the UK the «safest place in the world to be online», was amended this week after Conservative rebel MPs pushed for the top brass of Big Tech firms to face jail time if they fail to protect under-18s from harmful content.
The rebels point to similar liability for bosses under health and safety legislation and those in finance. They add that if senior managers who work in sectors that can wreak wider damage face criminal sanctions, then so should those at the top of Big Tech. The criminal amendment pushed by the rebels is modelled on existing Irish legislation. Meanwhile, the EU’s Digital Services Act also places similar requirements on Big Tech to remove illegal content.
In the US, lawmakers have been slower to grasp the nettle, even if politicians on both sides of the aisle want to curb Big Tech. President Joe Biden has called for a bipartisan effort to better protect privacy and to diminish the «liability shield» of section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which gave tech platforms immunity for content others post on their sites. The court’s full docket, along with Elon Musk’s efforts at Twitter to roll back content moderation in the name of free speech, mean that lawmakers, judges and regulators on both sides of the Atlantic will be busy determining just where the line between free speech and harmful content lies.
Especially since I think a good part of them might have been hired in the past 1-2 years with Google and other such companies.
ReplyDeleteYes, that is a lot but keep in mind that all these companies have hired a lot more people in the past 2-3 years. Some (or all) have highered too many and now they need to lay off some of them.
ReplyDeleteWhere does the line between free speech and harmful content lie? How can one or more people decide this for the rest of us? It's a very, very hard thing to do and it will certainly lead to heated discussions or problems.
ReplyDelete