Skip to main content

FTX's boss admits mistakes.

 Sam Bankman-Fried said he "never tried to commit fraud" but admitted he made "a lot of mistakes" ahead of the collapse of his $32bn cryptocurrency empire, which threatens to inflict significant losses on users of his popular FTX trading platform.

The founder of the now-bankrupt crypto exchange FTX denied "knowingly" commingling customer funds with those held by Alameda Research, his proprietary trading group.

"Clearly, I made a lot of mistakes or things I would give anything to be able to do over again," Bankman-Fried said at The New York Times Dealbook summit.

Appearing virtually from the Bahamas, Bankman-Fried grinned nervously, repeatedly tapped his foot, and appeared to shake involuntarily as he faced questions on topics from prescription drug use by FTX staff and improper transfer of funds to whether he knowingly flouted risk and compliance rules that jeopardised customer accounts.

"I was failing to pay nearly enough attention to positions and positional risk on the exchange and to Alameda’s in particular and . . . I substantially underestimated what the scale and speed of the [crypto] market crash would look like," he said. "There is a substantial discrepancy between what the true, audited financials were . . . versus what the dashboards we had displayed for Alameda’s account, which substantially under-displayed the size of the positions."

The collapse of FTX was precipitated by panicked customer withdrawals and ricocheted across crypto markets. It was discovered that as much as $8bn of funds were missing. The failure is being examined by criminal prosecutors and regulators in the US and the Bahamas.

Bankman-Fried said lawyers had told him not to agree to interviews. "I think I have a duty to talk and to explain what happened," he said. "I don’t see what good is accomplished by sitting in a room pretending that the outside world doesn’t exist." Asked about whether he was worried about potential criminal liability, he said: "It’s not what I’m focusing on. I had a bad month."

Bankman-Fried was replaced as CEO of FTX by John Ray III, a restructuring expert who represented plaintiffs in the Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford frauds and helped unwind Enron. Ray had never seen "such a complete failure of corporate controls".

Bankman-Fried defended his position as one of the most prolific givers to the US Democratic party in the latest election cycle. "My donations were mostly for pandemic prevention, and they were looking at primary elections where there were candidates who are outspoken in favour of doing things now to prevent the next pandemic."

Bankman-Fried will continue to face questions and allegations from prosecutors, regulators, investors and up to 1mn creditors over FTX’s missing funds.

Asked if he would leave the Bahamas to come to the US, he said he "would not be surprised" if he was called on to give evidence at one of the hearings on the collapse.

‘I was failing to pay nearly enough attention to positions and positional risk on the exchange’

www.ft.com


Comments

  1. "Bankman" seems to be a well-suited name for Sam. He didn't know much and maybe he was just the face of this FTX. Maybe others are behind the collapse and he will take the fall.

    ReplyDelete
  2. On another (somewhat related) note: what is up with the very suspicious crypto related deaths lately? Tiantian Kullander and Vyacheslav Taran (major crypto CEOs) both died recently, plus it's been a month since millionaire cryptocurrency developer Nikolai Mushegian drowned in Puerto Rico.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Could this all be a coincidence? Or could they have maybe hidden their deaths and ran away with some crypto/money?

      Delete
    2. I think there needs to be some investigation done into their companies to see if something is missing. Until this is done we won't know for sure.

      Delete
    3. @J Or maybe someone that was/is laundering money through these companies had these people killed? It probably sounds far-fetched but what if...

      Delete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

US FED rate rise.

  The US Federal Reserve officials have indicated that they plan to resume increasing interest rates to control inflation in the world's biggest economy. During the June meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee reached a consensus to keep interest rates stable for the time being to evaluate whether further tightening of policy would be necessary. However, the majority of the committee anticipates that additional rate increases will be required in the future. The minutes of the meeting have recently been made public. According to the minutes, most participants believed maintaining the federal funds rate at 5 to 5.25 per cent was appropriate or acceptable, despite some individuals wanting to raise the acceleration due to slow progress in cooling inflation. Although Fed forecasts predicted a mild recession starting later in the year, policymakers faced challenges in interpreting data that showed a tight job market and only slight improvements in inflation. Additionally, officials gr...

EU business slide.

  S&P Global’s flash eurozone composite purchasing managers’ index, a key gauge of business conditions for the manufacturing and services sector, fell 1 point to 47.1, figures showed yesterday. That is its lowest level since November 2020 and the fourth consecutive month below the crucial 50 mark separating growth from contraction. One of the few bright spots in the survey was that companies in all sectors reported a slight easing of cost pressures, price growth and supply chain constraints. However, prices charged for goods and services still rose at the sixth fastest rate since such data started in 2002. Jobs growth increased marginally from October but remained low compared with the past 18 months. Following a few months of falling price pressure in manufacturing and services, the October print shows an overall stabilisation said Jens Eisenschmidt, chief European economist at Morgan Stanley. However, German businesses, at the hub of Europe’s energy crisis, reported that manu...

Tariffs on UK electric cars.

  The European Commission has confirmed that it will continue with its plan to impose tariffs on electric cars exported between the UK and EU starting next year. This is due to the "rules of origin" requirement that mandates EVs traded across the English Channel to have 60% of their battery and 45% of their parts sourced from the EU or UK or face a 10% tariff. A senior Commission official, Richard Szostak, recently informed parliamentarians from the UK and EU that the bloc's battery investment has significantly declined, making the tariffs necessary to encourage domestic production. In 2022, the EU's share of global investment in battery production shrank from 41% to only 2% after the US offered substantial subsidies through its Inflation Reduction Act. Starting in 2024, car manufacturers in the UK will need to have 22% of their sales come from zero-emission vehicles, which means they may need to import EVs from the continent to meet this requirement. If EU carmakers ...