Skip to main content

Exxonmobil increased share buyback.

Exxon mobil share buy back

 Exxon said it would spend $50bn in the three years to 2024 buying back its own shares, an increase from a $30bn programme set to end next year. Joe Biden has criticised Exxon and other oil companies, telling them in October that they «should not be using profits to buy back stock or for dividends . » The company will spend between $23bn and $25bn on energy projects next year, up from about $22bn this year. Exxon has raised its spending on low-carbon projects to $17bn from now until 2027, up from $15bn.


The projects will focus on carbon capture and storage, as well as biofuels and hydrogen. Rival Chevron said that it would increase spending 25 per cent next year to about $17bn, including $2bn on its lower-carbon business. Exxon said in 2019 that it planned to spend $30bn-$35bn a year on its business while Chevron had planned annual spending of roughly $19bn-$22bn. The bulk of Exxon’s spending will go towards oil and gas projects in the Permian shale basin in the US, deepwater projects in Guyana and Brazil, and new liquefied natural gas ventures.

The company said it would increase total output 14 per cent from 3.7mn barrels of oil equivalent a day this year to 4.2mn boe/d by 2027. The rise in spending is being made as oil prices have retrenched in recent weeks over fears that an economic slowdown will sap energy demand. Brent crude was trading at about $78 per barrel yesterday, down 20 per cent over the past month and roughly level with where it opened the year, a big reversal after reaching near-record highs a few months ago. Trading houses have been among the biggest beneficiaries of an energy crisis that has roiled the world economy.

Comments

  1. Joe Biden should have done more than just criticize Exxon and other oil companies. Sometimes it seems like Biden is actually working for or with them. If he and others really wanted to make these things sting they would adopt measures to discourage such actions especially now with all that's going on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly! Those are just words. Until I see some action I don't believe one word. Instead of investing much more in low-carbon projects, they invest so much in buying back its own shares.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...