Skip to main content

US dollar pull back from 20 years high.

 

The dollar has fallen in the past fortnight from a 20-year high as signs of inflation easing in the US fuel speculation that the Federal Reserve will soon slow down its rate rises. The greenback has declined more than 3 per cent against a basket of six peers in November, leaving it on track for the biggest monthly fall since July 2020, according to Refinitiv data, and sparking a debate in currency markets over whether the currency has peaked. This month’s fall comes as investors scrutinise early indications that US inflation may finally be easing, potentially paving the way for the Fed to reduce the speed at which it has been boosting borrowing costs. However, some data, such as those on the housing and manufacturing sectors, have also suggested the broader economy is facing rising headwinds, another deterrent to Fed monetary tightening.

Everything is pointing to disinflation in the US, and with that, we will see a slowdown in the US economy in the first quarter of next year. The yen has rebounded somewhat from a slide to a 32-year low against the dollar, prompting the Japanese government to spend billions propping up its currency. Indications of easing inflation have also upended wildly popular wagers on a stronger dollar in currency markets. «We expect the US dollar’s powerful climb over the past year to reverse in 2023 as the Fed’s hiking cycle ends,» HSBC foreign exchange strategists wrote in a note to clients last week.

In recent weeks, traders have trimmed their bets on a stronger dollar to the lowest level in a year, according to figures from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which provide a snapshot of how speculative investors such as hedge funds are positioned in currency markets. At the same time, fears of a global recession and the financial market volatility unleashed by rapid monetary tightening also favoured the US currency, which as the ultimate safe harbour of the global financial system, tends to rise in times of stress. Both those tailwinds are now set to fade, according to HSBC, which argued that «gravity should take hold» for the dollar as the often chaotic sell-off in global bond markets, caused partly by central bank rate rises, calms. Despite the about-turn in markets, a few recent hawkish speeches from Fed officials have tempered bets that the Fed is slowing down.

« Even if inflation has peaked, it will be sticky and volatile on the way down». With traders firmly focused on month-by-month US inflation figures, he added that a slight upside surprise could easily cause the entire global currency market to skew back in the other direction. That sentiment was evident in remarks by St Louis Fed president James Bullard on Thursday, who said that rates would need to be raised to a minimum of 5 per cent to tame inflation. «It’s premature to call a peak in the dollar because the Fed expects further rate hikes,» said Joe Manimbo, an analyst at Convera.

www.sba.tax

Comments

  1. The dollar tends to rise in times of stress which is exactly why it has risen to where it stands. Now, as some tensions are lowered, the dollar will go down a bit. If a US recession will follow (in the next 9 months) then the dollar will go down like never before.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...