Skip to main content

Twitter clashes with big advertisers.

 

After several waves of lay-offs and departures, Twitter’s ads business team has shrunk so much that many agencies no longer have any point of contact at the company and have received little to no communication in recent weeks, according to four industry insiders. One media buyer said that some brands had been unable to get feedback on how previous campaigns had performed because of the staffing shortages. In addition, Musk is under pressure to draw revenues from Twitter, as he faces $1bn in annual interest payments after loading the company with $13bn of debt to help fund his acquisition of the business. On October 27, the day he closed his $44bn deal to buy Twitter, the Tesla and SpaceX head sought to reassure marketers that the platform would not become a «free-for-all hellscape» despite his plans to relax content moderation restrictions.

Soon afterwards, he conducted phone calls and meetings to reassure top ad agencies and brands. In the meetings, Musk appeared across all the details of how the platform is run, two agency executives said, impressing brands with his knowledge. Groups such as General Motors, Volkswagen, Carlsberg and General Mills have announced they would pause spending on the platform given the moderation concerns. Robin Wheeler, who started heading up Twitter’s ads sales business under Musk after the former chief Sarah Personette resigned, left the company last week.

Bloomberg reported that Wheeler was fired by Musk after refusing to sack more people in the ad sales team. Twitter and Musk did not respond to requests for comment. Musk’s use of Twitter has also unnerved brands who fear their content being placed next to harmful content. The self-described «free speech absolutist» further irked advertisers when he relaunched Twitter’s premium subscription service, Twitter Blue, as its «blue tick» feature was abused by impersonators, targeting politicians and brands such as Eli Lilly and Lockheed Martin.

In mid-November, Omnicom Media Group recommended clients pause spending on the platform, according to three people familiar with the move, following a similar recommendation from Interpublic. «Musk’s best chance of bringing advertisers back to Twitter is to appoint a new CEO,» said Darren Savage, chief strategy officer at Tribal Worldwide.

www.sba.tax

Comments

  1. Most advertisers will be back in just a few months but yes, Twitter needs a new CEO quickly. We will see which accounts are reinstated and how the conversation goes from then on. It's clear that liberty of speech should be a priority but we shouldn't just allow anything and everything on the platform.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They do need a CEO but I’m not sure most advertisers will be back. Some of them are scared that Twitter will become the place where everything can and will be said, including conspiracy theories with no basis in reality. Things like these will keep advertisers away.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...