Skip to main content

MTD platform delays.

 


HM Revenue & Customs’ new platform for companies to register to pay value added tax has «caused havoc», according to advisers, sparking wider concerns about the agency’s plans to overhaul its systems. Its ultimate aim is to automate returns and payments for companies and households for all the main taxes. But Ruth Corkin, technical chair of the VAT Practitioners Group, which brings together tax agents from across the country, said «the new system has caused havoc, to put it mildly» and that «the delays are horrendous». Richard Wild, head of tax technical at the Chartered Institute of Taxation, said the new platform had been «introduced with limited testing by agents, little forewarning, and inadequate guidance».

Companies with annual turnover exceeding £85,000 must register for VAT. Monthly VAT applications received by HMRC this year have ranged from 25,000 to 70,000. «We have had so much contact about this,» said Caroline Miskin, senior technical manager of the ICAEW. UK businesses can trade in the period between applying for and receiving a number, but Corkin said there was a «huge administrative burden» in that time as companies prepared to send delayed invoices.
Corkin added that foreign sellers faced the worst delays, which HMRC attributed to checks and replies taking longer, and that «a lot of online traders I know have said, ‘we’re just not going to trade in the UK’ ». Emma Rawson, technical officer at the Association of Taxation Technicians, said HMRC should ensure «they do not launch any new IT services until they are confident they are fit for purpose and have been robustly tested». According to the authority’s service dashboard, VAT registration has recently been operating a «normal service», aiming to respond to applications within 40 working days. The service level agreement was recently increased from 30 working days.

www.sba.tax.

Labels:

Comments

  1. Nate15 November 2022 at 10:44

    I don't know about you but for me, 40 working days to respond to applications is just unacceptable. They have to do what they must to get this time to 14-20 days max. We're in 2022, not in 1990.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...
4 comments
Read more

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...
3 comments
Read more

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...
2 comments
Read more