Skip to main content

FED's Fourth consecutive increase.

 


Jay Powell has signalled that the Federal Reserve is prepared to slow the pace of its campaign to tighten monetary policy but warned that interest rates would ultimately have to rise to a higher level than previously expected. Speaking after the US central bank increased its primary interest rate by 0.75 percentage points for the fourth consecutive time, the Fed chair said the bank would not need to see a series of monthly lower inflation readings before switching to smaller increases. Powell's comments suggest policymakers are willing to entertain the possibility of opting for less aggressive growth at the Fed's next meeting. "We still have some ways to go, and economic data since our last meeting suggests that the ultimate level of interest rates will be higher than expected," Powell said in a press conference yesterday after the Fed's two-day meeting.

Markets struggled to interpret the Fed's stance, with stocks jumping after the statement's release before sinking when Powell warned that rates would top out at a higher "terminal" level. Powell spoke after the Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously to increase the federal funds rate to a target range of 3.75 per cent to 4 per cent. The US central bank said that "ongoing increases" in the fed funds rate would be necessary to have a "sufficiently restrictive" impact on the economy and bring inflation back to the Fed's longstanding 2 per cent target. The Fed's decision to press ahead with another 0.75 percentage point rate rise comes against mounting evidence that the most acute inflation problem in decades is not decreasing.

That is despite signs consumer demand is starting to cool and that the housing market has slowed significantly under the weight of spiralling mortgage rates, which last week rose above 7 per cent. At September's meeting, most officials projected the fed funds rate reaching 4.4 per cent by the end of the year.

www.sba.tax

Comments

  1. They projected the fed funds rate reaching 4.4 per cent by the end of the year but I think it's going to be more than this (maybe 4.8%+). Consumer demand is slowing down and it will go even lower soon enough. We are in for a tough winter that's for sure.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...