Skip to main content

Brexit barriers should be lifted.

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt acknowledged that Brexit has thrown up trade barriers between Britain and its biggest trading partner but claimed it will be possible to remove “the vast majority” over time.

On Thursday, the Office for Budget Responsibility, the independent fiscal watchdog, said the latest evidence showed that Brexit had had “a significant adverse effect on UK trade”, cutting trade volumes and relationships between British and EU companies.

Meanwhile, Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think-tank, yesterday said: “Very clearly Brexit was an own economic goal. But, economically speaking, that has been very bad news indeed.”

The economic impact of Brexit has become a subject of increasing debate in business and among members of the public, but it remains taboo for the main political parties.

A YouGov poll this week found public support for Brexit had fallen to a record low of 32 per cent, compared with 56 per cent who thought it was wrong.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who backed Leave in the 2016 referendum, has played down the role of Brexit in Britain’s poor economic performance. However, at the G20 summit in Bali this week, he said that all countries had their “idiosyncrasies”.

Shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves said a Labour government would not rejoin the EU’s single market or customs union, let alone the wider bloc, although it would try to soften the impact of Brexit.

Reopening the toxic Brexit debate is seen as a sure-vote loser for both parties.

Even the pro-European Liberal Democrats accept there is no immediate prospect of a reversal.

Hunt told the BBC yesterday that he had “great confidence that over the years ahead, we will find outside the single market we can remove the vast majority of the trade barriers that exist between us and the EU. It will take time.”

www.sba.tax from financial times

Comments

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...