Skip to main content

BP's quarterly profits doubled.


The oil giant's underlying profits, up from $3.3 billion a year earlier, were one of its best results ever and significantly better than the $6.1 billion analysts had forecast, thanks to an "exceptional" result by its gas traders. The company announced it would reward investors by buying back $2.5 billion of its shares. The company said that it expected its taxes in the North Sea this year to include about $800 million relating to the levy imposed by Rishi Sunak when he was chancellor in May, which increased the effective tax rate from 40 per cent to 65 per cent. BP is one of the world's biggest oil and gas companies, with operations in about 70 countries worldwide, ranging from exploration and production to fuel retailing.

It is the fourth most significant oil and gas producer in the UK North Sea. The company has made global underlying profits of $22.8 billion this year as it benefits from higher oil and gas prices, which surged after Russia invaded Ukraine. Although oil prices have fallen back from their peaks in the summer, they still averaged more than $100 a barrel in the third quarter, compared with less than $74 a barrel a year earlier. Gas prices in the UK averaged more than 280p a therm in the third quarter, compared with 119p a therm a year earlier.

Alok Sharma, the president of the COP26 climate summit, called for the government to "raise more money from a windfall tax on oil and gas companies and actively encourage them to invest in renewables". "The left-of-centre IPPR think-tank called for a tax on share buybacks, accusing BP of "making huge profits and channelling these straight back to already-wealthy shareholders through share buyback schemes". "A 25 per cent windfall tax on the share buybacks of BP and Shell would raise to £4.8 billion per year for the Treasury. "BP shares rose 1p, or 0.2 per cent, to 481½p this morning."

The shares have risen 37.5 per cent so far this year.

www.sba.tax

Comments

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...