Skip to main content

IMF criticises Britain

 With sterling selling off and borrowing costs rising on Tuesday, the fund stated about 8 pm London time, chiding the UK for its plan to implement £45bn of debt-funded tax cuts and urging it to «re-evaluate» the package. Almost five days after UK chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng delivered his «mini» Budget, the timing of the IMF statement raised eyebrows. It was sent out in response to media requests rather than as a planned statement from the fund, raising speculation it might not have been thoroughly vetted. Nevertheless, senior IMF managers, including managing director Kristalina Georgieva, approved its release, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The UK was not given an advance copy, said another person briefed on the events. «If you have a mandate for global financial and economic stability, you have to have a view,» the person said. However, the unusually sharp criticism directed at a G7 country also raised questions about whether the IMF had overstepped its remit by commenting on domestic policy outside of a typically scheduled review or an update to its global economic outlook. 

In addition to fuelling a crisis engulfing the British government, the IMF’s criticism of tax cuts that would «benefit high-income earners» and «likely increase inequality» chimed perfectly with Labour’s attacks on Kwarteng’s fiscal plan. Finance ministers in France, Germany and Spain have criticised the budgetary package. Adding to a sense of urgency was the scale of the financial turmoil in the UK and the possibility it could soon spread to other major markets.

«This is a time when monetary policy has to fight inflation everywhere, and fiscal policy needs to help,» said one IMF insider. «But they are doing exactly the opposite, and the central bank now has to print money to buy debt,» the person added, referring to the BoE’s emergency £65bn intervention in the gilt market to prevent a pensions meltdown. «When there’s a crisis or policies that are manifestly irresponsible, it’s kind of natural for the IMF to take some kind of note,» he told the Financial Times. «We are dealing with a level of fragility that turns things that possibly would not have been shocking into shocks,» said Sarah Bloom Raskin, former deputy Treasury secretary in the Obama administration.


One prominent British financial commentator called for a boycott of the «outrageously arrogant» institution, arguing it was a «faddish, hypocritical body» that had become «explicitly aligned with the Joe Biden left».

www.sba.tax


Yet the IMF has largely backed Biden’s fiscal policies, touting the positive impact of the last pandemic stimulus. «It is puzzling that the IMF felt it necessary to opine on a G20 nation’s domestic policy and only now to oppose a ‘large and untargeted fiscal package’,» said Bill Hagerty, senator from Tennessee.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...
4 comments
Read more

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...
3 comments
Read more

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...
2 comments
Read more