Skip to main content

Orcel VS Santander

 Spanish bank Santander must pay Andrea Orcel €68m in compensation after losing a legal battle over its rancorous 2018 U-turn on hiring the Italian banker as chief executive. 

The ruling was a significant blow for Ana Botín, executive chair of the Spanish lender, whose tenure since succeeding her father Emilio Botín has been marked by the decision to hire Orcel, a family confidant, and then to drop him, with the resulting legal fight. 

The payment the court-ordered from Santander included €10m “for moral and reputational damages” to Orcel, as well as contractual items including €5.8m for two years of salary, a €17m sign-on bonus and €35m compensation for loss of long-term incentives at UBS. 

The court ruled that both sides had signed a “valid” contract, which had been broken in a “unilateral and unjustified” manner by the bank and that, therefore, it had to pay compensation. 

“I think it’s unfortunate that we are where we are, but if people look only at the facts and what has emerged in court, the conclusions are clear,” Orcel said in an interview with the Financial Times before he knew that the court’s decision was coming yesterday. The court quoted what it described as “particularly eloquent” tweets by Botín, in which she gushed about Orcel’s appointment “effective from the beginning of 2019”, as well as a promotional video and interviews in which she gave the same message. 

The Madrid court ruling capped a long-running dispute between Orcel, one of Europe’s best-known investment bankers and now head of UniCredit, and Spanish lender Santander, his former client when he worked at UBS and Merrill Lynch. 

 The case centred on Santander’s decision to withdraw an offer it made to him in 2018 when Orcel was running UBS’s investment bank. 

Santander said: “We disagree strongly with the ruling. 

The bank claimed Orcel’s offer letter did not amount to a contract under Spanish law.

Summarised www.sba.tax

Comments

Cloud Bookkeeping

H&M struggles with profitability.

  H&M blamed high clothes prices ,  its exit from Rus­sia and a cost-cut­ting pro­gramme for an unex­pec­tedly large col­lapse in its earn­ings as the world’s second-largest fash­ion retailer’s struggles with prof­it­ab­il­ity con­tinue .  Oper­at­ing profit plunged 87 per cent to SKr820mn in the fourth quarter to the end of Novem­ber from a year earlier .  Shares in H&M fell more than 4 per cent to SKr125 . 80 yes­ter­day ,  hav­ing lost nearly half of their value since their recent peak in April 2021 .  The Swedish retailer ,  which lags behind Indi­tex ,  the Span­ish owner of Zara ,  in sales and prof­it­ab­il­ity ,  launched a SKr2bn cost-cut­ting pro­gramme last year that included 1 , 500 job losses . H&M’s sales in the fourth quarter were up 10 per cent to SKr64 . 4bn but flat in local cur­rency terms .  It said sales from Decem­ber 1 to Janu­ary 25 had increased 5 per cent in local cur­ren­cies .  «Sales in ...

Commercial properties continue to fall

  UK commercial property values and rents are projected to «tumble off a cliff edge» in the first quarter of 2023, as estate agents warn offices will fare worst as prices fall. A survey of more than 400 commercial agents forecast a 2.9 per cent decrease in prices per square foot across the industry in the first three months of the year, with offices falling 3.1 per cent. «Where we saw the market stop still, we will see the market finding its level, people working out where things are, where value is,» he said. Listed vehicles have already seen this valuation drop in their share prices, with real estates investment trusts such as Land Securities and British Land falling by a fifth or more this year. According to the RIB estate report, offices are expected to suffer the most significant sales price falls, with nearly a third of respondents expecting them to come down by more than 5 per cent. In addition, the survey projected a 1.3 per cent fall in rents per square foot over the perio...

BoE is considering to increase deposit guarantee.

  According to anonymous sources, the Bank of England is considering reforming its deposit guarantee scheme. The move comes in response to concerns that the current system may not be sufficient to protect customers in case of a bank failure. The Financial Services Compensation Scheme guarantees deposits up to £85,000 per person per institution. However, some experts have raised concerns that this may not be enough to prevent a run on banks in a significant financial crisis. As a result, the Bank of England is reportedly considering several options for reforming the scheme, including increasing protection and introducing more stringent bank regulations. A final decision on any changes will be made later this year. One option the Bank of England considers is increasing the protection offered by the deposit guarantee scheme. This could involve raising the maximum amount guaranteed per person or extending coverage to more types of deposits. Another possibility is to introduce more stri...