Skip to main content

BoE looks to tighten crypto rules

 The Bank of England will step up talks next year with its international counterparts on a regulatory regime for fast-growing crypto assets.

Sarah Breeden, executive director for financial strategy and risk at the Bank, said that moves by banks to offer cryptocurrency trading and custody services to clients meant that global regulators needed to design rules to protect the financial system. 

Crypto investments take three primary forms: currencies such as bitcoin, which are not backed by any assets; so-called stable-coins, which aim to hold a store of value more like a means of payment; and decentralised finance, whereby a loan agreed between individuals could take the form of a string of computer code. 

“The closer those assets get to the core of the financial system, the more likely those knock-on effects are likely to be material.” While this is just 1 per cent of all global assets, the vast majority of those assets are in “unbacked” items such as bitcoin, which have no underlying assets supporting them. 

“We don’t have a regulatory framework that’s fit for crypto-coins yet, but what we are doing is rolling our sleeves up and getting ready to build it,” Breeden said. 

“The ability to get data on what institutional investors are [holding] is a challenge,” she said. 

While the Bank has said the risk posed to the financial system by the cryptocurrency market is limited at present, it wants to know more about the sector’s growth. 

The Bank of England faced “challenges” in finding data on cryptocurrency holdings by institutional investors. 

This was work, Breeden said, the Financial Stability Board would discuss that — a body that unites central banks globally, including in Japan, America, Europe and Australia. 

The market value of crypto assets has increased tenfold since 2020 to around $2.6 trillion. 

The Treasury has already proposed that the Bank regulate stable coins, but this system does not yet exist. 

Some 2.3 million Britons own crypto investments, but their holdings are typically small. 

Summarised www.sba.tax

Comments

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...