Skip to main content

self-assessment deadline looms

Accountants say that they are stuck in a “big black hole of frustration” as they wait for their clients to get the unique taxpayer reference code they need to sign up to self-assessment.

The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, which has more than 150,000 members, warns that thousands will miss the January 31 deadline for returns for the 2020-21 tax year because of huge delays in processing requests for the codes. 

 The institute said you could use a workaround to pay tax without filing a return, using your national insurance number, but said that you may need professional accountancy software to make sure you did it right. 

Claire Roberts from the accountancy firm Moore Kingston Smith warned against trying the workaround: “The only way you could realistically go through a manual approach is to engage a professional accountant who can use their own software to calculate your tax bill based on your earnings. 

If you file your tax return late, you could be fined £100, but you should avoid the fine as long as you send it within 3 months of getting the code. The tax office sends codes out in the post, regardless of whether you are completing your tax return online or on paper. 

If you pay late you can be fined 2.6 per cent of the tax owed and another 5 per cent on March 2. 

    Anyone filling out a tax return for the first time could miss the self-assessment deadline in January because of huge delays at HM Revenue & Customs. 

HMRC said: “We are now working through the stocks of post and clerical interventions that built up over the past year, as we prioritised delivery of the government’s Covid-19 support packages, the UK’s smooth transition from the EU and the essential services that keep the tax system running. 

Summarised www.sba.tax



 

Comments

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...