Skip to main content

Government's growth target

Tony Danker, director-general of the CBI, will use its annual conference to urge the government to be more ambitious with its growth targets and deal with an absence of policies needed to achieve Boris Johnson’s ambition for a “high-wage, high-skill, high-growth” economy. 

In an interview with The Times, Danker, 49, said that the country was “going back to a 2008 storm” when, soon after pledges were made to transform the economy after the financial crisis, “we started arguing politically, we had an MP scandal crisis, and everybody just got on with business as usual, and the economy flatlined for a decade”. 

Danker said that the prime minister was “betting the shop” on the private sector delivering his agenda around net-zero and levelling up but that he needed to “seize the moment” and “start to make bigger bets. 

    The government’s economic growth targets and policies on skills, investment and productivity are “nowhere near bold enough”, the head of Britain’s most prominent business lobby group will tell ministers next week. After 2008 until the pandemic, the nation’s economy has grown at an average of 1.3 per cent per year with “zero productivity growth”. 

Danker said: “At what point did we give up on Britain being a 2 to 2.5 per cent growth economy?” 

Forecasts published by the Office for Budget Responsibility alongside the chancellor’s budget showed economic growth forecasts of between 1.3 per cent and 1.6 per cent in 2024 and 2025. However, the former Treasury adviser said that the government should aim for the 2.5 per cent annual economic growth achieved in the 1990s and 2000s. So I think the government are hoping that the private sector delivers on all this stuff. 

 I think it’s more complicated than that.” 

Comments

Cloud Bookkeeping

HS2 cost cuts new routes and add delays.

 Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have begun work on «Project Sil­ver­light» sug­gest­ing the high­speed rail scheme might face four addi­tional years of delay. The planned High Speed 2 rail line faces fur­ther delays of up to four years and more cuts to the project under plans being drawn up by min­is­ters to rein in its bal­loon­ing costs. The extra delays to the coun­try’s biggest infra­struc­ture project would mean that it would not be com­pleted until as late as 2045 — 12 years after ori­gin­ally planned. «This is a func­tion of infla­tion; we are hav­ing to find huge sav­ings because the cost of everything the depart­ment is already doing will have become so much more expens­ive by then,» said one gov­ern­ment offi­cial. In Octo­ber, the FT repor­ted that the Treas­ury had asked HS2’s man­age­ment team to identify poten­tial cuts or «scope reduc­tions» to the high-speed line. Trans­port depart­ment offi­cials have sub­sequently begun work on Project Sil­ver­light aimed at fi...

Doubt on CS's collateral.

  Credit Suisse provided an emergency $140mn loan to Greensill Capital based partly on invoices to companies that deny ever doing the business stated on the documents. The Swiss bank provided the loan in October 2020, less than five months before the collapse of Greensill, a supply chain finance firm that counted former British prime minister David Cameron as a senior adviser. Invoices issued by metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s Liberty Commodities and sold to Greensill formed part of the collateral for the loan, according to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the transaction. Yet several of the parties named on the invoices have told the FT they did no business with Liberty. GFG has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Credit Suisse’s loan had a clause dictating that the collateral value had to be equal to or greater than the $140mn borrowed. The terms of the debt agreement only allowed invoices on Green-sill’s balance sheet to count towards this tally if t...

Small business will be excluded from fraud law.

  Min­is­ters are plan­ning to exclude small busi­nesses from anti-fraud legis­la­tion by nar­row­ing the scope of a crim­inal offence tar­get­ing com­pan­ies that fail to pre­vent eco­nomic crimes. MPs and anti-cor­rup­tion cam­paign­ers had hoped the gov­ern­ment would seek to amend the eco­nomic crime and cor­por­ate trans­par­ency bill to ensure the new offence covered all com­pan­ies. The plans to limit the scope of the amend­ments will also dis­ap­point those who had hoped the legis­la­tion would remove key hurdles to the pro­sec­u­tion of white-col­lar crime. A new «fail­ure to pre­vent» offence for fraud would bring it in line with exist­ing sim­ilar cor­por­ate offences for bribery and tax eva­sion. At present, pro­sec­utors need only prove that organ­isa­tions lacked «reas­on­able» or «adequate» con­trols to pur­sue the offence in bribery and tax eva­sion cases. «It would be much more sens­ible for the gov­ern­ment to provide strong guid­ance for SMEs on what these pro­ce...